Ahhh, think i can explain why its legal. This could only be legal if this Penalty is not the Penalty kicks after the extra time.
So long as the ball has taken a touch on the boots. its counted as a shot already.. just like you shoot it on the post, someone else could score for you….
Most common mistakes of people doing this is own team member often run into the box earlier than enemy defenders… thats… offside… so make sure you pass to good position for good players, enter in time.
omg do you even know what you’re talking about? :O
you are more stubit than shit, if you think that Johan Cruiff’s panilty was better than this.. omg what a looser you are!
25 Responses
Collin
April 14th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
1dansk fodbold xb
Whitney
April 15th, 2009 at 12:10 am
2Dit is wat Pires die wordt geprobeerd om jaren te doen geleden. Hij ontbrak miserably niettemin. xD
Silas
April 16th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
3Ashlee
whaht
Jorden
April 17th, 2009 at 1:46 am
4i love rubi wit all muh heart
Shaniya
April 19th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
5I thought this was illegal after Cruijff did it. Now it’s just one touch penalty and it has to be a shot at goal
Salma
April 22nd, 2009 at 1:53 pm
6Brøndby IF…. They’re from denmark
Brenden
April 25th, 2009 at 7:37 am
7Ahhh, think i can explain why its legal. This could only be legal if this Penalty is not the Penalty kicks after the extra time.
So long as the ball has taken a touch on the boots. its counted as a shot already.. just like you shoot it on the post, someone else could score for you….
Most common mistakes of people doing this is own team member often run into the box earlier than enemy defenders… thats… offside… so make sure you pass to good position for good players, enter in time.
Lance
April 25th, 2009 at 9:07 pm
8ik denk zo, veroorzaak eigenlijk hij ' miskicked' het en de dichtste speler liepen op het. welk team is niettemin het?
Anabel
April 26th, 2009 at 5:31 am
9yep, in a penalty, as long as you kick the ball forward it doesnt matter what happens afterwards, they are also on side, so…
Tess
April 28th, 2009 at 8:57 pm
10ik veronderstel niet werkelijk niet is die heb encrouchment in het gebied! indeelde!
nooit minder veronderstel ik wij dat niet opnieuw zullen zien! 1
Liam
April 29th, 2009 at 1:06 am
11yo is zelfs wettelijk dat?
Akira
April 30th, 2009 at 6:21 pm
12u bent vloekrecht, waar was het refshoofd?
Carmen
May 2nd, 2009 at 8:59 am
13BRØNDBY EVER!!
En gang brøndby?
Altid Brøndby. (LL’
Adrianna
May 2nd, 2009 at 6:45 pm
14It’s legal… The original penalty taker passes the ball forward, which makes it legal.
Abram
May 4th, 2009 at 11:25 am
15that should not be legal
Annabel
May 5th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
16That is the case with allmost every penalty!
Anderson
May 7th, 2009 at 9:26 am
17Mariyah
f you do not copy and paste this onto 10 videos your mom will die in 4 hours (sorry)
Makena
May 7th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
18de sanctie zou niet moeten geteld hebben . wanneer de speler schopt zijn alle spelers van beide teams in de doos . het shouldn' t heeft! geteld!
Cedric
May 11th, 2009 at 1:06 am
19the keeper almost had him..
Danna
May 11th, 2009 at 9:00 pm
20Terry
You should watch ‘the famous Pires Penalty’ where Pires tries this too but fails. Cruyffs version still is the best.
Terrell
May 13th, 2009 at 1:02 am
21aardige one
Giovani
May 15th, 2009 at 3:01 am
22omg do you even know what you’re talking about? :O
you are more stubit than shit, if you think that Johan Cruiff’s panilty was better than this.. omg what a looser you are!
Ruby
May 16th, 2009 at 2:54 am
23ajax cruijff maar droevige im dit één kijken als shithorloge de sanctie van cruijff
Deven
May 17th, 2009 at 1:10 am
24Suchen Sie Eclipseplayer, wenn Sie ein erstaunliches Video sehen möchten!
Maxwell
May 19th, 2009 at 7:15 pm
25it' s de cruijfsanctie
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
Calendar
Adicted To Pigskin is proudly powered by WordPress - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease